Kill the Mermaids!
The Prince of Wales married a commoner in 1981, when I was young and impressionable. It gave me some wild hopes. Only a couple years later, when I was still young and impressionable, some people at Walt Disney waved a fairy wand over H.C. Anderson's masterpiece and let the little mermaid* walk away with her prince--happily ever after.
Today, I admit I'm still impressionable. I'm also the nerd hanging around the periphery of any writers' circle: the one whose mantra is "writers have a moral responsibility to write responsibly". They hate me for it. Last month at the guild meeting my colleagues accused me of championing didactic literature. The same literature the rest of the creative bunch expelled in the 70s for its finger-wagging and view-obstructing high horse. They threw paper wads in my hair and called me nasty names like "pedagogue".
I should mention here that the colleagues to whom I'm referring are Norwegians. And mainly of that hip generation who rebelled against the establishment. Planning a revolt against a liberal, newly wealthy, socialist-leaning society couldn't have been easy. The only option for these all-around nice-guy types was to rebel against their own upbringing. This lead to "fri-oppdragelse". Loosely translated this means "hands-off parenting", the best argument against which I witnessed in the checkout line at IKEA a few years ago:
A man in his thirties was minding his own business, politely waiting in line to pay for his bendy desk lamp with a plastic stoplight-red base and shade when, for no reason at all (or perhaps for the reason that she was nine-years-old) a nine-year old girl, holding an ice cream cone in her right hand, used her left hand to repeatedly ram her mother's shopping cart into the poor man's legs. The man brought this fact to the attention of the girl's mother, and made a polite request for her to prevent her daughter from continuing this particular activity. To which the mother replied, "I'm sorry. We practice hands-off parenting".
Being a more culturally evolved person (probably because he hadn't fathered any children), the man was puzzled. He then, calmly, deliberately, shoved the little girl's ice cream into her face.
"How could you?" the mother screamed.
"My parents also practiced hands-off parenting."
Okay, I didn't actually witness the incident. I heard it described by someone who knew someone who saw it. Or who knew someone who knew someone who saw it. But that's all right. By virtue of the fact that I call myself a writer, I'm not a liar. I'm using "poetic license" and that's moral behavior. And that's why I put in all the details. You know, to make it seem more real. And while I'm being honest, it wasn't paper wads. It was bottle caps and stuff. And the names they really called me… well, they're not always a very creative bunch.
They are however, vehemently opposed to anyone writing a story with a moral. I keep saying that every story they tell has a moral, whether they like it or not. A protagonist makes choices and there are consequences. The consequences reflect a view of reality. "This is true," says the writer.
At a dinner party once, I had a short discussion with one Norwegian who was uncommonly proud of the picture books her country produces. She said that they win more international awards than any other country. I had to admit that I'd read very few of them.
When my son was small I had asked a librarian to help me find some good Norwegian books to read to him. He suggested one book in particular: a story about a girl who gets so angry she piles all her toys in the middle of her room and urinates on them. That's where the story ends. I told the woman at the party that I'd decided not to read it to my son. Sure, it's funny, but I don't want to have to see the look on my son's face when, after he's tried it himself (you know, it being so funny and all) he realizes his toys are pretty much ruined once they've been peed upon. So I asked her, "Don't you think children's stories should include real-life consequences?"
And she said: "Well, I didn't think so when I wrote it."
I actually did witness this incident and I'll let you figure out the moral of that story.
By now you probably think I'm a super-strict parent when it comes to what I let my kids read and watch on television. If you do, could you whisper that to my neighbours? You see, my nine-year-old has been a Star Wars fanatic since he was four. Other moms on the block think it's irresponsible of me to allow him a steady diet of all six films on our 36-inch screen. But I'd much rather he watch that than Disney's The Little Mermaid. In Star Wars, the bad guys are bad guys because of the choices they make. The good guys make difficult choices and don't always get what the want. No matter how thin and good-looking they are. "This is true," says the mom.
In our current culture of nature/nurture debates and empathy in regard to social injustices and unfortunate choices made by people in already-unfortunate circumstances, it's still NOT all right when Anakin slaughters the tribe of Tusken Raiders responsible for his mother's death. In fact, that event is the one that pretty much sets him on his road straight to Mustafar, a fire-and-brimstone kind of planet.
Best of all, even after all the hideous things Anakin had done as Darth Vader, there's hope for redemption in the end. I admit, when my son is wearing his black mask and swinging the plastic thing that makes that awful buzzing noise, he's not playing the Prodigal Dad Vader. But he and I have discussed what happens at the end and how cool that is. We discuss it all the time. Then again, he's nine. I'm not sure how much I should want him to focus on THE END now anyway.
My point is: the lesson's there. So what if legions of critics are throwing paper wads in George Lucas's hair because he wrote a Christian allegory. He's in good company.
Last week I read an online column from The Boston Globe in which Mr. William Flesch says that, as adults, we are put off by the blatant "educating" going on in C.S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia. He explains that this is why we don't want to read it as adults and why Mr. Lewis's books haven't been included in the Norton Anthology of Children's Literature.
Mr. Flesch does concede that kids enjoy the book, but, well, basically that's because they are too dumb to pick up on the lessons. In other words, Mr. Flesch seems to be of the opinion that Mr. Lewis wasted an awful lot of effort on the whole allegory bit, but despite that it turned out entertaining.
I am really grateful Mr. Flesch pointed out the fact that I don't want to reread Mr. Lewis's book. Because if I did, that would mean that I have the literary comprehension of a six-year-old. Either way, I'd like Mr. Flesch to know that reading his column was a real learning experience for me.
And I'd also like to ask him what he thought of Spiderman II.
Trashy. That's what I think. Grotesque. I'm not talking about the guy with the octopus arms (what does the movie industry have against octopuses anyway?). I mean the story. There are all these parents picking films because of nudity, extreme language, violence …why didn't someone stand up and protest when they saw the scene in which Spiderman exposes himself? When his mask is torn away and all the people on the train tear up with gratitude and awe and promise to keep his secret?! What secret?! The writers blew it. They blew the whole superhero concept!
Forget nudity, this is immoral. A superhero can't have his cake and eat it, too. Adoring fans who know who you really are is a reward, a HUGE reward in our fame-hungry society. Didn't those guys see Spiderman I, weren't they paying attention? Did no one listen to Uncle Ben before he died? Doing the right thing isn't easy. Shouldn't be easy. That's not the way the world is. That's the way the world is for someone taking seriously mood-altering drugs.
Fortunately we'd rented the movie, so my kids and husband were the only ones annoyed by my outburst, and they were able to rewind the tape to where I'd begun screaming. We watched the rest of the movie. It got worse. His aunt knows, doesn't she? And then there's Mary Jane. (I still have a scar on my tongue because I was told to bite it or leave the room.) He can't have the girl! Didn't they see Superman II? Superman did the right thing. In the end.
As a mother of two boys, I won't go far as to say I hate Spiderman. That wouldn't be nice. But I do intensely dislike him. He's a bad influence. As bad as that trashy little mermaid.
I know. I know you think I'm coming down awfully hard on the mermaid. It's not like I want to take the streets with a placard saying, "Kill the Mermaids!", but hey: the moral of the story? Like many of Disney's stories: if I'm a thin and pretty young white woman and want something intensely enough, I'll vanquish the ugly old woman (and her equally ugly heirs), Daddy will wave from beyond (the ship's railing or the Great Beyond) and I'll take centre stage at the side of my rich hubby Handsome. Cue music. Release the doves.
No wonder we all want plastic surgery. Or Prozac. Or Both.
*If you've never read H.C. Anderson's Little Mermaid: first, shame on you; second, she dies.
**I'd like to thank my nine-year-old son, who prefers to remain anonymous, for his help with this essay. Without him I wouldn't have been able to spell Mustafar and we probably wouldn't have cleared up that misunderstanding about when Luke kept hitting those asteroids. Asteroids aren't particularly annoying droids!
copyright 2006, Ren Powell (first published 2005, HUB)
Do not reprint without express permission.
Technorati Tags:ethics, film, writing, parenting, mermatids, h.c. anderson, mustafar, spiderman, asteroids, norwegians, ice cream
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator
"5 Minutes for Mom" is all about celebrating and promoting moms. The site owners are work-at-home moms who also run a collectibles store and a rocking toy and kids furniture store. They created "5 Minutes for Mom" to improve the visibility of mom-owned websites.







48 kommentarer:
I really want to meet the guy in Ikea! He would fit into my motley crue rather nicely
:-)
What can I say, I pretty much agree with every word you wrote, today. And entertaining to boot!
tp
I'm glad you came back! I'm always up for a food fight in Ikea!
Hi, thanks for visiting my blog and leaving a comment adn for the suggestion of where to eat. I've made a note.
I must say I agree with a lot of what you say. We have a lot of hands off parenting (or is that can't be bothered parenting?) in the Uk at the moment and a recent report says we have the worst teenagers in Europe!
I also hate the trash that Disney pumps out. That is not real life at all. It is no wonder that kids become confused and angry as they grow up when the gulf between fiction and reality is presented to them.
You're the 1st person I know who hates the Lil' Mermaids and Spiderman 11 .
Don't you like the music in the Mermaids at least ? or the love scene in Spiderman 2 ?
I'm interested to know .
In all seriousness- I loved watching the Little Mermaid and the music is great- but she really does need to die in the end. We have unreasonable expectations and I fault the storytellers as much as the toothpaste ads. - I don't remember much of Spiderman 2- I'll ask my sons :-)
Ren, what an entertaining essay... I loved it. And I definitely agree with you.
I'm also happy to hear that we're not the only ones who let 4 year olds watch Star Wars. (My twin sister boy is 4 and I treat him like my own.)
My little girl is still too young to know of the Little Mermaid and so I have yet to watch it. But I'm sure I'll have many a day to ponder the ills of Disney.
(Also, thanks for the link back to "5 Minutes for Mom". We're honored to have you included in "Our Readers' Blogs" directory.)
Wow, just looking at your "labels" list, you covered some ground with this post.
I enjoyed your weaving, wandering style. Loved the ice cream to face story. Loved it!
I also loved Spiderman II. I related deeply to his identity crisis, which nearly stripped him of powers. I didn't think his unmasked ID had anything to do with fame and glory. EVERYONE, including superheros, wants to know they are appreciated. The common folks in that movie were being ignored, and now they know he's one of them.
I hope you come back to explore some poetry. I haven't written much recently, but the old stuff still works, I think. Also, I have a poetry blog, with rare posts, but more off the edge style, like Ashbery, but worse. It's called Geognosy.
If you'd like to exchange links, I'd be tickled and honored, if that's possible in one breath.
EVERYONE, including superheros, wants to know they are appreciated.
Exactly- what makes superheros superheros is that they aren't appreciated, but bother anyway. Be good because it's the right thing to do- not because you'll be rewarded. With our society's preoccupation with fame (fame at all costs- just think of Dumbass or Jackass or whatever they're called)that idea is getting lost. But I'm going to check out your poetry anyway :-)
Susan,
. . . don't get me started on Dreamworks and Fiona- she turns fat and green and that's the worst they could do to a skinny white redhead? ;-)
I go along with the fantasy of these things because the idea of anonymity for superheroes defies reason. for a start it must be a 24-7 job, I hardly think he'd be out of his uniform (well, of course, he wears it all the time under his ordinary clothes). the moral must be; secrets are bad, especially if you're in a position of power.
mermaids are evil though, aren't they? luring sailors to their deaths.
Ian, reason in the same sentence as superhero?
Ariel is a nice girl- not a siren at all- but she still has to die. H.C. was right.
I don't think we communicate you and I. But this isn't the philosophy war anyway and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.
Wow! I was with you through the hands-off parenting / Ikea part, but we diverged on the Disney / Spiderman part. On one level Ariel's goals were laudable-- to be accepted for who she really was-- and on another level they were shallow: forks and dogs and dancing. (Okay, I understand the dancing.) And Spiderman is a super hero, but he is also human, with temptation and loss of faith and needing affirmation from other humans. Books and movies have always leaned toward giving the reader or viewer a happy ending. Is death always the consequence of breaking out of the mold? Does everyone have to be a martyr to be authentic?
I'd love to write more, but I have to go make a sales call. Thanks for stopping by my place. You gave me lots to think about today!
I guess, Mitey Mite, you haven't read HC Anderson. The Little Mermaid dies because she gives up her heritage, changes who she is completely by false means (magic) for the love of a man. It's got absolultely nothing to do with being accepted for who she was. She's not a martyr for anything.
I cannot tell you how much it frightens me that so many people would find that laudable.
As for books having "always leaned toward giving the reader or viewer a happy ending"- we sure aren't reading the same books and I bet we don't have the same concept of "always".
What on earth is hands-off parenting?! It makes no sense at all! The guy in Ikea sounds like a real laugh!! I agree with you about the lessons in Star Wars being related to choices. I think it's a great idea to let your son watch the films and discuss them with him!
I just wanted to thank you for stopping by my blog..simple as it may be!! I am feeling some better today!! Your comments maybe helped!! I see you do not like Spiderman very much!! Hmmm!! I just love the movies. I guess I just take them for what they are comics!! Fun!! I love them just like Superman or anything that has come from our old comic Books..supposed to just be FUN!! I love FUN and I guess I just look at it that way..but I do see what you mean though...this is why I love blogging..You can get your ideas out there and clear up your mind and do some venting..good for you...Sandy
We have to have our happy endings, right? Happy as defined by movie studios and test audiences. I remember reading somewhere that if the studio execs had known Crouching Tiger was going to be a big hit, the movie execs would have put the movie through a test audience...and everyone lived happily ever after.
I was torn between racous laughter, wise agreement and wondering if anyone brought that I tried to pull off 'wise'.
Sorry, Ian- I was wrong- I'm in!
You know the parents who discipline their kids through out a store, screeching at the top of their lungs? I have a hard time figuring out which set of parents bring on a cringe in me; the screechers or the hands off. They are the same in my head.
My godson has seen all six episodes of Star Wars and is an avid fan. He began his fascination when he was five; growing out a rat tail to be like his idol Anakin.
Excellent post.
Great story about the IKEA man, Ren. Kat. I wish I were as brave. It is what I'd dream of doing but would never dare.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading your article. Funny you mention Lewis's Chronicles on the same day I did. Although, perhaps we share differing opinions on it leveling with the comprehension of a six-year-old. Never-the-less, I'd love to link to your blog, if you wouldn't mind. Please do let me know.
And thanks for the welcoming to Poetry Thursdays.
j.
We tell so many fairy tales to kids...my girls have never been much into the princess thing. Ones a jock, the others a brain...
I just have a hard time convincing them they can be beautiful(young) women too..so many labels.
Interesting topic..
ps gave you my vote...
Wow. Thanks for visiting my blog. Becuase you did, I'm really enjoying reading yours.
I didn't think I was going to be sucked into this philosophy war but as I read the comments, I couldn't help myself.
Ren.cat, I completely agree that a Superhero is defined as a person or vigilante who does good not because they will be rewarded but because it's the right thing to do. I find it interesting (unless I'm mistaken) that the concept of "Superhero" is an American invention and was designed to save us from all the big bad evils we had no control over once we found ourselves inevitably drawn onto the world stage. "Protecting truth, justice and the American way" was pretty much the party line, even if your superhero name wasn't Superman. We sure could use a Superman now, or a Spiderman, or a Wonderwoman, no less. And this is the trouble with our times. We don't do good unless we will gain something in the end... bar a scant few doing good out there.
Wasn't there an episode of "Friends" once that dealt with this? (Now I will expose myself as the drivel watching fiend that I am... please don't tell anyone) Joey and Phoebe got into some argument about doing selfless good deeds and began competing over it. You know, who could do the biggest good deed and recieve no personal gratification out of it. The argument was that even Mother Theresa had an agenda, which was to gratify herself in her faith... or something like that. Anyway, Phoebe tried to top Joey by pledging a large sum of money to PBS, putting Joey in the spotlight becuse he was the volunteer who took the call at the pledge drive and therefore got his face on TV, and she stated that she felt very displeased about the whole thing. The truth of the matter is that it's incredibly hard for us to do the right thing without even feeling good about ourselves as a reward and therefore we have Superheros.
As for Mitey Mite's comment that Ariel's efforts to achieve her goals (to be accepted for who she was) should be lauded COMPLETELY missed that point. Mitey Mite, Ariel was a MERMAID. She paid dearly (she actually gave up her own VOICE) to have herself altered because she wanted something that she couldn't, by natural rights, have otherwise, which was a relationship with a rich royal. So what you're implying is that since I was not a natural born model but I am a screenwriter, I could give up my ability to write coherently in exchange for a little nip and tuck and become a page 3 girl, and that's ok? Or have I missed your point and you, in a sense, are likening Ariel's situation more to the that of a transexual, in which case you'd be right? But as far as I can see, a mermaid ain't a human and a human ain't a mermaid...
What's more, has anyone aquinted themselves with the musical arrangements of Allan Menken and Howard Ashman? I don't want to be as arsehole here but I hate how "Part of That World" and the musical "Little Shop of Horrors"'s tune "Somewhere That's Green" could be the same song. It tics me off. I think it's lazy songwriting. And I know, I know, academy awards and all... don't get me started.
I'll go back to my corner and rant over there!
oh, okay but i was being facetious rather than philosophical. :o/
Yes! (still laughing) I want to be true to myself, too- I'm transbeautiful. Guess that's my point exactly- that we all now believe that perfection is a birth right- we're entitled to everything we want. Those are the stories we're telling ourselves. Did you ever read Clavel's The Children's Hour? It's about a teacher who takes a morning prayer and turns it into a communist oath in a single hour- turns the children against their religion and their parents etc. by making very subtle changes to what they've already accepted. I think that's what we've done with our stories in the last half century. Amoral- not in a religious sense, but in that stories traditionally, cross-culturally reflect the world to prepare us for life. It's irresponsible.
And yeah- when I saw that episode I figured (once again) that someone was stealing an idea I'd given them at a party somewhere- running off at the mouth about how Mother Teresa was expecting a prime place in Heaven. . . ) I'll join you in the ranting corner, Molly!
Sorry, Ian, I should have seen that. Must have been feeling defensive :-)
really interesting... you know i come along with the most and i think most people don't discern the bad influence of these "polished" kdi movies you refer to, because they are way too flashy or pompous to see underneath...
the ikea insintence was very hilarious and meanigful
Hey Ren.Kat,
love the Ikea story.
I can't say that I have read the Little Mermaid, but I can certainly see were you're coming from, and I will say that I agree.
great post, got my vote
Nath.
The story about the ice cream incident was the funniest thing i've read in ages. I'm going to remember it! What an amazing post, so full of insight and interest.. i'm so please di stopped by!
I think you're right that there is value in stories showing real world consequences. There should also be more stories illustrating that even really good people get blindsided by unforeseen hardship.
I think there is also something to be said for entertainment simply for entertainment's sake, however. There's just an overabundance of fairy tales in our culture and an impetus for people to believe they should be living in one.
I was very hurt and insulted by your comment- I didn't critize to show off how bright I am. I understand that game but that's not what's going on here (it can be fun, though :-)). Disney changed the end of the story without considering how that changed the moral of the story. The result is sad, at best. (THE MORAL- the movie is cool). Superheros are super because they do the right thing even when it's not easy or applauded. Spidey II forgot it and gave into the crave for fame. I think it's a serious failing. I'm not addressing symbolism or coded allusions etc.
Sorry all- I'm not going to repeat or defend myself again. It's getting rather silly.
laini- reading the comment you left on my other blog- the comment here doesn't strike me as "bashful" at all. To quote Inigo Montoya, ". . .that word. I don't think it means what you think it means."
Sorry -- I shouldn't have left that comment. I apologize.
ren.kat- where can i find your poetry?
I paid him to ask that question.
(my books are published in Norway- bilingual editions- they are on Amazon) Some of my poems are on my website www.renpowell.com. There's also some audiofiles on my other blog. Thanks for asking!!
Great post ... You got my vote ;)
"Hands-Off Parenting?" Are you kidding me? There are days, I'll admit, when I let my boys run wild because I'm just too tired to deal - but never at the expense of others. We just stay home on those days :)
So this is a "real" parenting style? I just can't get over it.
As far as Disney's The Little Mermaid - I'm thankful I don't have girls.
I love reading your posts ... I'm going to include your link on my blog. Keep writing ...
Great post rk... (can I abbreviate like that?)
I think you nailed it.
'nuff said :)
Hands-off parenting? Who ever came up with that concept? I don't see how parents can miss how harmful the consequences of that are -- and how they can lack the realization that children NEED guidance and consequences and that's why they have parents!! I hate to think what these kids are going to be like when they grow up total slaves to their passions with no self-control.
I agree 100% percent with your comments on "The Little Mermaid." I had read the original story and was miffed that in the film Ariel defies her father, rebels, and then then gets off scot-free with her father feeling like he was the one who was wrong.
I did like Spidey II. :-) But I can see your points.
Evenstar- abbreviations are fine when you say such nice things :-)
Thanks for reading! - ALL of you. Even those of you who disagree with me.
Barbara H.- the hands off parenting also includes the attitude that adults shouldn't intervene when children fight- quarrel or bully! I can't tell you how furious this attitude has made me or how much damage it has done. . .
I just popped over here from your An After-Hours Blog and loved this piece! I too am of the parenting world that shakes its head at the nouveau parenting styles such as "hands off" ... not that I recommend "hands on," in a literal sense ... but I do believe it is our job to teach our children right from wrong, good from evil, and to instill a sense of moral responsibility and compasssion. I do prefer books and movies that have a message, illustrate natural consequences, that have a hero or heroine ... even if that just means being the hero of your own life. My 10 year old daughter is also a Star Wars fan, and she also has a strong sense of what is noble and just (plus she digs the cool special effects and the drama of the stories!) Anyway, this is a long way of saying, I absolutely agree with what you wrote! much peace, JP
I also agree with this piece. I would much rather have my daughters learn that actions have consequences rather than waiting for some guy to rescue them.
Han: "What are you doing?!?"
Leia: "Well, *somebody* has to save our skins!"
-- f
WOW! That was some interesting writing. I don't know where to begin. Lets see, first I will give you some fuel for your fire. In Disneys "mermaid" the preacher who is marrying the sea witch to the prince, before ariel has her voice back, has a hard-on if you pause it at the right point and in the original cover art all the castles in the background were made of dildos. Has nothing to do with what you wrote but if you hate it-then HATE IT!
I agree with reality being important and making sure that children and everyone for that matter understand what is real and what is fake.
I personally love the little mermaid and want to name a future daughter, if I have one, Ariel. That's me. I love fairy tales, but trust me-I realize they are a bunch of bullshit, I just like them.
On the other hand StarWars rules and is much more realistic. There is not really a bad and good sides-dark side whatever...its just two different ideas clashing which is like real life.
Great job again on your essay and the comments were wonderful too. I'm so glad you decided to stop by so I know you exist because this has truly been fun!
Hi Chris, thanks for the comment- just as a point: The little mermaid isn't really a "fairy tale"- at least not in the Grimm tradition. And the "fairy tales" that you have heard are a far cry from the Grimm tradition. They've been bowdlerized like you wouldn't believe! Fairy Tales are not for little kids, - go check 'em out.
And thanks again for the comment!!
I am far to familiar with the Grimm tradition of tales, I just like happy endings. The tradition of Grimm is much more realistic and depressing, but by far better written. They just don't have catchy soundtracks and beautiful animated merfolk. I grew up with only the Grimm editions. It took a while to figure out the fairy tales I later heard were adaptations of the same stories. What a difference. And once again your the best for the help you gave me. I'm expecting my first two published books to arrive this weekend and I have three more ready to go if they look nice.
No problem, Chris! Like I said, just beware vanity publishing's flattering scams. I do know people who've been happy with POD, knowing what POD "published" books are all about and without illusions.
Some of us need outside verification :-)(not that it helps when it comes to actual marketing-especially when the publisher is in Norway and the lion's share of the market in the US. . .).
All the best!
post script: you are the only one I know who grew up on the real Grimm. I didn't read them until high school and was completely shocked-- all the dismemberment and flying fingers. .
Oh, wondrous! Articulate, literate and grammatical! Funny, pointed and even poignant. That was just too much fun! I love the Ikea man. Reminded me of an experience of my own. I was in Borders Books with my adult daughter. There was an obnoxious 5 or 6 year old running about the store, hollering and being a general nuisance. I held my tongue until he ran past me with his arm extended and hand clenched in a tight fist and socked me in a reasonably unmentionable area of my anatomy. My first thought was to stick my foot out and trip him, but I managed to restrain myself and merely muttered "little demon" sotto voce. Well, the little demon made a running u-turn and screeched to a halt in front of me, shouting at the top of his lungs "I am not a demon, I'm a Jason!" I calmly responded "well, then you must be Jason the demon." He ran away screaming, "Mo-om, that lady called me a demonnnn". I was standing inline waiting to pay for my purchases when he returned with his mother in tow. She yelled and cursed at me, (I began to see that the apple didn't fall far from the tree) for addressing her darling in such a fashion and reviled me as a child abuser and ill mannered witch. I politely explained what he did. She continued her noisy tirade, suggesting that it was immature at best to speak to the demon himself, rather than address the parent. I informed her (still in a calm tone at a normal speaking volume) that a "parent" would have been visible within the vicinity of her child, perhaps even officiating as a parent, by appropriately supervising the little demon. Of course, my daughter (who would, you think, be accustomed to her mother's peccadilloes by her age) was mortified as the woman continued to scream and gesticulate and generally make a scene which culminated in the young mother inviting me loudly (and to the amusement of the growing audience) to "step outside", so she could teach me how a "mother" behaves. I informed her that had I raised my daughter with the same indifference that she was raising her little demon, I'm sure she'd be happy to go outside with her and kick her ass up and down the promenade, but that since she, by virtue of me, her mother, had better manners and more class than that, we'd both have to take a pass. The clerk called for the next customer, and I walked away to the sound of gentle applause from the onlookers.
It was a hoot.
Post a Comment